https://shop.cobetter.com/collections/hollow-fiber-filters
https://www.ballyribbon.com/fibers/polyethylene/
<aside> 💡
Timeline of project (Jan 6 - Feb 14)
</aside>
I worked in a team to design a filtration component for a wastewater treatment plant by considering its mechanical properties and performance. The assigned scenario for my team was “Microplastic Filtration for Large-Scale Plant”.
The goal is to design a wastewater management system for the city of Hamilton that is capable of filtering water contaminated with microplastics while reducing environmental impact in a way that is feasible for a large-scale plant.
One of the main stages of the material selection process was the analysis of the Ashby chart which compared the ratio between 2 properties. To determine our final material, we placed our constraints as limits to ensure the top materials fit the constraints. The top materials generated from this were Polyethylene, Polypropylene, and Styrene-Acrylonitrile (SAN).
Figure 1. Ashby Chart with High Moldability. The chart used to select the final three materials for analysis. Other charts analyzing yield strength and cost showed similar results, with the three labelled materials always ranking in the top five.
I was responsible for calculating the porosity of our chosen material which initially was Silicon Carbide with a porosity value of 0.01. This was not an ideal porosity for a filter fiber since it would be unable to capture the contaminants which was one of the main reasons we changed our chosen material to Polyethylene.
The porosity calculations were crucial in identifying key mechanical properties of the filter.
Key properties of the filter:
All relevant porosity calculations
✅ Time Management
✅ Leadership
✅ Project Management
✅ Granta Edupack
✅ Porosity/MPI Calculations